Investor Positioning - Strategy Update and Flows The Boom And The Gloom.pdf
Deutsche Bank · 52pp · filed 2026-07-27
· sha1:0c22aa8975e140119de2
original documentInvestor Positioning - Strategy Update and Flows The Boom And The Gloom.pdf
source of record/Users/vertex/Library/CloudStorage/Dropbox/Backup/2026/July/Jul 27/Deutsche Bank/Investor Positioning - Strategy Update and Flows The Boom And The Gloom.pdf
What this page is. A reconstruction that reunites three artifacts the pipeline keeps
apart: the OKF frontmatter contract, the full per-page OCR text, and every cropped figure.
The object actually stored at docs/sha1:0c22aa8975e140119de2.md in broker-gallery
carries a lead extract plus a figure index — not the full text — so this is a reading
view, not a byte-for-byte re-render of the bucket object.
Captions are bound by page geometry, not by docling.crop_figures computes
a bounding box for every figure and the stored figure_files record throws it away,
which is why the OKF payload could never check a caption and flagged all of them suspect.
Recovering each crop's position on the page — by locating it inside a re-render of its own
source page — binds the caption that physically sits above it. Result on this document:
81 captions where docling agrees, 94
recovered where docling had none, 3 where docling pointed at the
wrong figure. Every figure below carries which of those it is.
In-house only. Broker research under the 2026-07-28 licensing ruling — no
redistribution.
OKF frontmatter — the stored contract (23 fields)
type
BrokerDocRender
audience
["fund-ops", "engineering"]
schema_version
1.0
file_id
sha1:0c22aa8975e140119de2
title
Investor Positioning Strategy Update and Flows The Boom And The Gloom
description
Investor Positioning Strategy Update and Flows The Boom And The Gloom — Deutsche Bank, 52pp, filed 2026-07-27.
Global Asset Allocation Investor Positioning and Flows
The Boom And The Gloom
The equity market has once again been in a tight range, in place for 2 months now, accompanied by notable rotations, echoing the period from November to February (Rotation Continued Amidst The Chop, Jan 2026). This week it fell to near the bottom of the range as positioning slipped to neutral. While the Q2 earnings reporting season so far confirms the boom that began in Q1 is accelerating, it has been overshadowed by the gloom around surging Tech capex, escalating geopolitical risks, climbing oil prices and rising rates. We note:
n Booming Q2 earnings handily beating a very high bar. Two weeks in and about a third of the way through the season, nearly 90% of the companies have beat, with aggregate earnings coming in 10% above consensus. S&P 500 earnings growth for Q2 is on track to hit 34% yoy, well above the high bar of 26% set by consensus and our expectation of 29% (Looking For Growth In The High 20s, Jun 30 2026). While MCG & Tech growth (53%) is massive, that for the rest (23%) is also very strong. And looking ahead, consensus numbers for Q3 and Q4 as well as 2027 have continued to rise, which contrasts with the typical pattern of forward estimates falling through the season.
n Gloom around a host of concerns, however, has seen equity positioning fall to neutral. Discretionary investors (17th percentile) have cut exposure back to early-April lows. Their positioning is well below levels implied by earnings as well as macro growth. Systematic strategy positioning (70th percentile) meanwhile is still relatively elevated and vulnerable if volatility picks up or if equities break out of the range to the downside.
n Rotation out of large-cap Tech about three quarters of the way through as positioning slides from elevated levels. As we noted over the last 2 weeks, large-cap Tech positioning had bounced to elevated levels coming into this earnings season. Even with extremely strong Q2 results, positioning has fallen sharply to nearly neutral (56th percentile) on concerns around runaway capex and the sustainability of off-the-charts growth. It is notable that after reporting results, Tech companies have so far sold off on the day (-1.9pp median) while the rest have on average been flat. The rotation out of MCG & Tech which began on cue in early June (Rotation On Cue, Jun 5 2026) has seen them underperform the rest of the S&P 500 by almost 15pp, about three-fourths of the way down from the top of the long-run relative performance channel (14% annualized, 20% top to bottom).
IMPORTANT RESEARCH DISCLOSURES AND ANALYST CERTIFICATIONS LOCATED IN APPENDIX 1. Deutsche Bank does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. Thus, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision.
24 July 2026 Date Strategy Update
Parag Thatte
Strategist +1-212-250-6605
Binky Chadha
Chief Strategist +1-212-250-4776
Karthik Prabhu
Strategist +1-212-250-1246
Dag Workayehu
Strategist +1-212-250-4771
page 2
n Disruption premium in oil has shot up but is still below March extremes. The renewed escalation in the Middle East has seen oil prices rise about 40% so far. Oil prices are now more than 50% above our estimate of medium-term fair value based on global growth and the US dollar, well beyond the typical band of +/- 30% on either side. At the peak in March, they were 75% above. Similarly, the premium in the front month contract relative to that 6 months out has shot up, as has oil price volatility but both are still below March peaks.
n Rising rates reflect Fed hiking expectations but breakeven inflation rates have not risen meaningfully on the latest flare up in oil prices. Compared to the start of the Iran war in late February, 10y real rates are now more than 70bps higher, and 2y real rates about 170bps higher, as expectations for Fed rates have moved from cuts to hikes. Rates volatility in turn has also risen, which as we have pointed out in the past, is usually a temporary drag on equities (Higher Rates or Higher Vol? Nov 2022). Breakeven inflation rates meanwhile have not yet risen significantly this month despite the ramp up in oil prices, and a catch up remains a risk.
Positioning and flows details on page 13
page 3
Charts of the week
Figure 1:The S&P 500 is once again stuck in a narrow range …
Figure 6:… in contrast to the typical pattern of cuts to forward estimates during
bar_chartconfidence 0.590recovered from page geometry5-5.png
page 6
*Wtd average of Z-scores for positioning indicators, weights based on explanatory power in regression of equity performance on indicators
Figure 7:Aggregate equity positioning has fallen to neutral on the back of sharp cuts in exposure by discretionary investors to their lowest level since early April, while the positioning of systematic strategies remains relatively high
Figure 17:10y break even inflation rates have essentially gone sideways but 10y
line_chartconfidence 0.999recovered from page geometry11-16.png
Figure 18:Breakeven inflation rates have not yet risen significantly despite the
line_chartconfidence 0.999recovered from page geometry11-17.png
page 12
page 13
Positioning and flows detail
n Our measure of aggregate equity positioning fell from modestly overweight to slightly below neutral this week (-0.05sd, 36th percentile). Discretionary investor positioning declined sharply to notably underweight (-0.52sd, 17th percentile), taking it to its lowest level since early April. Systematic strategies' positioning (0.52sd, 70th percentile) was pared but stayed overweight. Positioning in large caps (0.23sd, 56th percentile) was trimmed to modestly overweight, while positioning in large-cap Tech (0.11sd, 56th percentile) declined sharply from extended levels to near neutral. Meanwhile, positioning in small caps (-0.13sd, 37th percentile) rose this week to slightly underweight.
n Discretionary investor positioning is now well below the tight range in place since Liberation Day.
n The ratio of call to put volume (5d ma) declined this week (36th percentile). Net call volume for single stock and ETF options declined, while that for index options rose modestly. Within singlestock options, volume declined sharply, primarily for MCG & Tech, followed by Financials. S&P 500 options skew (3m, 90%-110%) increased from last week.
n A basket of stocks with the highest net call volume in the prior week modestly outperformed the broader market this week, while a basket of the most-shorted stocks performed largely in line.
n Investor sentiment (bull minus bear spread) reversed to bearish again, the lowest in six weeks (15th percentile). Bullish responses (22nd percentile) tumbled to their lowest in 10 months, while both bearish (86th percentile) and neutral responses (38th percentile) rose.
n Under systematic strategies positioning,
n Vol control funds' equity allocation declined this week but remained elevated (76th percentile). Their sensitivity to market selloffs increased, making them more likely to de risk on downside moves than in recent weeks. While positioning is no longer near its recent extremes, they remain meaningfully invested in equities, with a higher sensitivity to volatility suggesting a less supportive backdrop in market drawdowns.
n CTAs' positioning in equities eased slightly but remained in the upper end of its historical range (66th percentile). Positioning declined across most regions, with Europe (78th percentile) and the US (67th percentile) remaining the largest long positions, while EM (60th percentile) and Japan (39th percentile) lagging. Further increases in equity exposure are likely to be driven more by declines in volatility than by additional strengthening in trend signals. A meaningful drop in equities (>3%) could see CTAs start to cut positions. Across other asset classes, short positioning in bonds remains elevated (US 15th percentile, European 13th percentile), longs in the dollar remain high (87th percentile), and in commodities, positioning in gold remains short (25th percentile), while longs in copper (91st percentile) and oil (71st percentile) remain high.
n Risk parity funds became modestly more constructive this week. Equity allocations increased to slightly above neutral (55th percentile), while bond allocations declined (39th percentile). Equity exposure rose across regions, led by developed markets ex US (62nd percentile) and the US (53rd percentile), while EM
page 14
remained more modest (37th percentile). Allocations to US bonds moved lower (45th percentile), to inflation-linked securities remained elevated (75th percentile), and to commodity exposure stayed near historical highs (96th percentile). Overall, the funds continued to shift toward equities while maintaining meaningful exposure to inflation-linked securities and commodities.
n Across sectors, positioning in large-cap MCG & Tech fell sharply to near neutral. Positioning in MCG & Tech (-0.16sd, 36th percentile) declined this week to modestly underweight, while that in large-cap Tech (0.11sd, 56th percentile) also declined sharply from stretched levels to modestly overweight. Energy (0.40sd, 83rd percentile) rose to overweight. Other cyclical sectors are notably underweight: Financials (-0.67sd, 18th percentile), Consumer Cyclicals (-0.82sd, 11th percentile), Industrial Cyclicals (-1.03sd, 5th percentile), and Materials (-1.27sd, 1st percentile). Among defensives, Utilities (0.16sd, 63rd percentile) stayed modestly overweight, while Real Estate (-0.23sd, 42nd percentile) slipped to modestly underweight. Healthcare (-0.37sd, 34th percentile) is modestly underweight, while Consumer Staples (-0.95sd, 3rd percentile) is very underweight.
n Weekly fund flows to ETFs & mutual funds: Equity funds ($30.4bn) received inflows again largely driven by Asia ($21.3bn), even as the US ($7.2bn) suffered outflows. Inflows to bond funds ($14.9bn) moderated to a three-month low, while money market funds (-$33.9bn) saw outflows.
n Inflows to equity funds ($30.4bn) remained strong but slowed to a three-week low. Inflows were driven largely by Asia ex-Japan ($27.2bn), particularly China ($21.3bn) and Taiwan ($4.8bn), while inflows to Korea ($1.5bn) slowed. Among other EM funds, broadEM ($1.9bn), Latam ($0.4bn), and EMEA (0.1bn) also received inflows. Broad-global funds ($6.8bn) continued to get inflows, but the pace weakened to the lowest in 11 weeks. US (-$7.2bn) and Europe (-$1.6bn) suffered outflows this week after consecutive weeks of inflows. Japan ($1.5bn) continued to receive steady inflows for a seventh straight week.
n Among dedicated sector funds, inflows to Tech ($4.0bn) slowed sharply. Financials ($1.4bn) received inflows for a fourth consecutive week, albeit at a slower pace. Healthcare ($0.8bn) received inflows for a seventh straight week. Energy and Utilities received modest inflows of $0.2bn each. Conversely, Industrials ($0.8bn), Real Estate (-$0.5bn), Telecom (-$0.5bn), Materials ($0.4bn), and Consumer Goods (-$0.3bn) saw outflows.
n Inflows to bond funds ($14.9bn) weakened to a three-month low. Inflows to broad-mandate funds ($5.2bn), Government bonds ($5.7bn), and IG ($1.1bn) slowed further from last week. HY ($0.4bn) and EM ($0.9bn) received modest inflows. Bank Loans ($1.0bn) received steady inflows again, while inflows to Munis ($0.3bn) slowed sharply. TIPS ($0.4bn) and MBS ($0.3bn) received modest inflows.
n Money market funds (-$33.9bn) saw outflows for a second week in a row, albeit at a slower pace than last week's massive outflows. US (-$23.8bn), Europe (-$9.7bn), and Japan (-$0.5bn) saw outflows this week.
page 15
DB S&P 500 Forecasts
Our Recent Publications
n Three Divergences - Jul 17 2026
n Nudging Up To Modestly Overweight Amidst Strong Inflows - Jul 10 2026
n Chart Pack - Jul 2 2026
n Choppy Rotation Continues – Jun 26 2026
n Bouncing Above Neutral - Jun 18 2026
n A Sharp Narrow Unwind - Jun 12 2026
n Rotation On Cue – Jun 5 2026
n Slower Choppier Grind Up - May 29 2026
n Equity Issuance Waves And The Market - May 22 2026
n Tech Comes Full Circle - May 15 2026
n Taking Stock Of The Rally - May 8 2026
Asset Allocation
n Q2 2026 earnings Looking For Growth In The High 20s - Jun 30 2026
n Is The Surge In Capex Crowding Out Buybacks? Jun 23 2026
n What Companies Are Saying: Time To Stop Calling Them Shocks? - May 14 2026
n Q1 2026 Global Earnings - Tech Drives Robust Growth - May 11 2026
n Q1 Earnings Takes - A Sharp Acceleration, Raising Estimates - May 04 2026
n Q1 2026 Earnings: Looking For A Four-Year High In Growth But Modest Beats - Apr 8 2026
n What Companies Are Saying - Addressing AI Benefits And Fears - Feb 24 2026
n Q4 2025 Global Earnings Takes – Tech And Emerging Markets Lead - Feb 13 2026
n Q4 Earnings Takes - A Sustained Broadening In Growth - Feb 09 2026
n Q4 2025 Earnings Early Takes - Jan 30 2026
n Q4 Earnings Preview: Stronger And Broader Again - Jan 06 2026
page 16
Consolidated Equity Positioning
*Weights based on explanatory power in regression of equity performance on indicators
1 Equity positioning indicators include: CTA portfolio weight, Risk-Parity portfolio weight, Vol control allocation, L/S HF beta, active MF beta, AAII Bull-Bear spread, cash equity median shorts , ETF short interest, equity futures positions, net call volume, S&P 500 option skew. More details can be found in Appendix
2 Systematic strategy indicators: CTA portfolio weight, Risk-Parity portfolio weight, Vol control allocation, equity futures positions; Discretionary indicators: Active MF beta, AAII Bull-Bear spread, cash equity median shorts, ETF short interest, equity futures positions, net call volume, S&P 500 option skew
Figure 22:Systematic strategies positioning vs S&P 500
line_chartconfidence 0.985recovered from page geometry16-21.png
page 17
perf
Sector Positioning
Data as of Jul 23 2026 MCG is Mega-cap Growth; Financials excludes MA & V which are under MCG; Industrial cyc: Industrials ex pandemic-hit cos; Cons cyc: Cons Disc & Media ex MCG ex Restaurants ex pandemic-hit cos.
Financials group positioning
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0.0
-0.5
-1.0
-1.5
-2.0
-2.5
Figure 23:Discretionary investor positioning vs ISM
line_chartconfidence 0.994recovered from page geometry17-22.png
Figure 24:Discretionary investor positioning vs S&P 500
line_chartconfidence 0.998recovered from page geometry17-25.png
Figure 25:Equity positioning across sectors3
bar_chartconfidence 0.977recovered from page geometry17-23.png
5 In mid-September 2025, our model was recalibrated to include funds allocation data extending through Q1 2025
6 Vol funds total equity allocation tries to mimic the equity rebalancing behavior of a sample of 25 Vol funds following a constant target volatility strategy.
Figure 43:Vol-Control funds equity allocations6
line_chartconfidence 0.983recovered from page geometry21-42.png
Figure 44:Vol-Control funds equity allocation and
line_chartconfidence 0.997recovered from page geometry21-44.png
Figure 45:Vol metrics breakdown
line_chartconfidence 0.996recovered from page geometry21-43.png
Figure 46:Vol-Control funds sensitivity to a 2% market sell-off
7 These are model-based portfolio weights, and take into account for each asset class the momentum trend signal, volatility, and cross-asset correlations. The model is designed to follow movements in CTA benchmark indices.
line_chartconfidence 0.997recovered from page geometry23-52.png
Figure 53:CTAs exposure to Oil
line_chartconfidence 0.949recovered from page geometry23-51.png
Figure 54:CTAs exposure to major Commodities
line_chartconfidence 0.989recovered from page geometry23-53.png
page 24
Risk-Parity funds portfolio weights 8 8
Data as of 22-Jul
-
2026
8 These are our model-based portfolio weights calculated to balance the risk contribution across different asset classes (equities, bonds, commodities), using volatility and cross-asset correlations. The model is designed to follow movements in risk-parity benchmark indices
Figure 77:All stocks net call volume across sector groups
line_chartconfidence 0.995recovered from page geometry28-74.png
Figure 78:S&P 500 stocks net call volume across sector
line_chartconfidence 0.980recovered from page geometry28-77.png
page 29
* Calls minus puts; Data as of 23-Jul-2026
14 Net Bullish Opened option volumes: Difference between newly opened aggregate bullish contracts (buying a new Call or writing a Put) minus newly opened aggregate bearish contracts (buying a new Put or writing a Call).
Figure 79:Net call volume of stocks outside of the S&P 500 across sector groups
line_chartconfidence 0.998recovered from page geometry40-122.png
Figure 127:EM equity futures positioning by asset
line_chartconfidence 0.999recovered from page geometry40-123.png
page 41
Bond Futures Positioning
Positioning data as of 21 Jul 2026; 2y futures are multiplied by a factor of 2 to be consistent with other Treasury futures contracts which have face value of $100k; contracts are wtd by effective duration based on 10y equivalents while aggregation
Positioning data as of 21 Jul 2026; contracts are wtd by effective duration based on 10y equivalents while aggregation
Positioning data as of 21 Jul 2026
Figure 128:Aggregate bond futures positioning in
line_chartconfidence 0.994recovered from page geometry41-124.png
Figure 129:Aggregate bond futures positioning in % of
line_chartconfidence 0.999recovered from page geometry41-127.png
Figure 130:Bond futures positioning by maturity
line_chartconfidence 0.999recovered from page geometry41-125.png
Figure 131:Bond futures positioning by maturity
bar_chartconfidence 0.995recovered from page geometry41-128.png
*2y futures have face value of $200k; contracts are multiplied by a factor of 2 to be consistent with other Treasury futures contracts which have face value of $100k
Figure 134:SOFR futures positioning
line_chartconfidence 0.993recovered from page geometry42-130.png
Figure 135:SOFR futures positioning by asset managers
line_chartconfidence 0.999recovered from page geometry42-133.png
line_chartconfidence 1.000recovered from page geometry50-177.png
page 51
Appendix
Aggregate Equity Positioning Indicator
n Our measure of aggregate equity positioning is a weighted average of Zscores across several positioning indicators. The indicator weights are based on the explanatory power of each variable in a regression with movements in the S&P 500.
Below is the list of indicators used in the aggregate positioning indicator
n Vol-control funds equity allocation (Systematic). Vol funds total equity allocation tries to mimic the equity rebalancing behavior of a sample of 25 Vol funds following a constant target volatility strategy. More details can be found in the report 'Derivatives Spotlight: Vol Control Products Disentangled: A Driver of Low-to-High Vol Transitions – 24 Aug 2016 '
n CTAs equity weight (Systematic). These are model-based portfolio weights, and take into account for each asset class the momentum trend signal, volatility, and cross asset correlations. The model is designed to follow movements in CTA benchmark indices.
n Risk-parity funds equity portfolio weight (Systematic). These are our model-based portfolio weights calculated to balance the risk contribution across different asset classes (equities, bonds, commodities), using volatility and cross asset correlations. The model is designed to follow movements in risk parity benchmark indices.
n Equity futures (Systematic/Discretionary). Aggregate net long futures (long minus short contracts) for Asset managers and Leveraged funds in the S&P 500, Nasdaq 100, Russell 2000, S&P 400 and DJIA index, taken as a percentage of their open interest. Data from CFTC's Traders in Financial Futures report.
n Call/Put volume ratio (Discretionary). Ratio of total call volume to put volume across single stocks, indices and ETPs. Data from the Chicago Board Options Exchange.
n S&P 500 3m option skew (Discretionary). S&P 500 options skew (90%110% moneyness implied volatility spread, 3-month maturity) from Bloomberg. Indicator is negatively correlated with the S&P 500, and the zscore values are multiplied by -1 before inclusion in the composite.
n Investor Bull minus Bear spread (Discretionary). Investor sentiment (Bull minus Bear spread) from the AAII Investor Sentiment Survey.
n Cash equity median shorts (Discretionary). Median of Russell 3000 universe shorted shares, taken as % of outstanding shares. Indicator is negatively correlated with the S&P 500, and the z-score values are multiplied by -1 before inclusion in the composite.
n ETFs short interest (Discretionary). Aggregate short interest (price*shorted shares) of more than 100 largest equity ETFs in the US, taken as % of overall Russell 3000 market cap. Indicator is negatively correlated with the S&P 500, and the z-score values are multiplied by -1 before inclusion in the composite.
page 52
n Schwab Retail positioning index (Discretionary). Schwab Trading Activity Index (STAX) which gauges the sentiment of retail investors.
n MFs holdings beta (Discretionary). The equity beta of the holdings of a sample of broad active equity mutual funds (excluding cash) taken from their quarterly 13F filings. The beta of the holdings to S&P 500 returns is calculated over a 3 year window
Sectors Equity Positioning
n As an extension of the aggregate equity positioning, the sector positioning measure is also a weighted average of Z-scores across different sector level positioning indicators. The indicator weights are based on the explanatory power of each variable in a regression with movements in the S&P 500 sectors. More details can be found in the report 'Investor Positioning and Flows - Looking Across Sectors, Jul 7 2023 '
Below is the list of indicators used in the aggregate sector positioning measure
n Call/Put volume ratio. Ratio of Call volume to Put volume across single stocks and sector ETFs, and averaged out over the last one month. Data from the OCC.
n Sector fund flows: Fund flows to sector based ETFs and mutual funds, taken as a percentage of AUM, and averaged out for the last 13 weeks. Data from EPFR.
n Cash equity median shorts. A de-trended median of S&P 1500 sector shorted shares, taken as % of outstanding shares. Indicator is negatively correlated with the S&P 500 sector performance, and the z-score values are multiplied by -1 before inclusion in the composite.
n Active MFs excess return correlation. Rolling 3-month correlation of the excess returns of a representative sample of US blended mutual funds with S&P 500 sector excess returns (both relative to the S&P 500).
n Analyst consensus target. Analysts current 12-month target price for the S&P 500 sector, taken as a ratio to its 200d ma. Data from Bloomberg Finance LP.